fibula: has state pain

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bone
Weight: 0.44
, tibia
Weight: 0.42
, brooch
Weight: 0.31
, fracture
Weight: 0.18
Siblings clavicle
Weight: 0.32
, pelvis
Weight: 0.31
, rib cage
Weight: 0.31
, humerus
Weight: 0.30
, scapula
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pain 1.00
pain 0.93
feel pain 0.90
relieve pain 0.85
is joint pain 0.85
is nerve pain 0.84
is knee pain 0.82
has state sore 0.80
ache 0.77
has state dislocation 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(bone, feel pain)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(fibula, has state pain)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(bone, feel pain)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(bone, feel pain)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pelvis, has state pain)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(scapula, has state sore)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(scapula, is nerve pain)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(pelvis, is joint pain)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(bone, feel pain)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(fibula, has state pain)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(pelvis, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pelvis, has state pain)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(pelvis, is joint pain)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(pelvis, is joint pain)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(scapula, is nerve pain)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(scapula, is nerve pain)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(scapula, has state sore)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(scapula, has state sore)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(fibula, has state pain)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fibula, is joint pain)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fibula, is knee pain)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fibula, is joint pain)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(fibula, is joint pain)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fibula, has state dislocation)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(fibula, is knee pain)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(fibula, is knee pain)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(fibula, has state dislocation)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(fibula, has state dislocation)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fibula, is joint pain)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fibula, has state dislocation)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(fibula, is knee pain)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fibula, has state pain)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(fibula, has state pain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bone, feel pain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(pelvis, is joint pain)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(scapula, is nerve pain)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pelvis, has state pain)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(scapula, has state sore)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(fibula, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bone, feel pain)