ficus: be at rainforest

Related concepts

Parents	tree Weight: 0.72 , plant Weight: 0.61 , shrub Weight: 0.46 , variety Weight: 0.37 , member Weight: 0.28
Siblings	oak tree Weight: 0.38 , cherry tree Weight: 0.38 , apple tree Weight: 0.38 , maple tree Weight: 0.38 , christmas tree Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be at rainforest	1.00
be at tropical rainforest	0.95
be at tropical forest	0.85
be a part of forest	0.82
be at in forest	0.82
be find in forest	0.81
be at jungle	0.80
be at it natural habitat	0.77
be at tropical landscape	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(plant, be find in forest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(ficus, be at rainforest)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(tree, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(ficus, be at rainforest)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(tree, be at in forest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(ficus, be at rainforest)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(tree, be a part of forest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(ficus, be at rainforest)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(tree, be find in forest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(ficus, be at rainforest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(tree, be at rainforest)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(tree, be a part of forest)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(tree, be find in forest)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(tree, be at in forest)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(plant, be find in forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(tree, be at rainforest)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(plant, be find in forest)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in forest)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(tree, be a part of forest)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(tree, be find in forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at it natural habitat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(tree, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(ficus, be at rainforest)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(tree, be a part of forest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(ficus, be at rainforest)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(tree, be at in forest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(ficus, be at rainforest)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(plant, be find in forest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(ficus, be at rainforest)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(tree, be find in forest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(ficus, be at rainforest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(apple tree, be at it natural habitat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at it natural habitat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(ficus, be at rainforest)

Similarity expansion

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(ficus, be at tropical rainforest)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Salient(ficus, be at tropical rainforest)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical rainforest)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(ficus, be at tropical rainforest)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Salient(ficus, be at tropical forest)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(ficus, be at tropical forest)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(ficus, be at it natural habitat)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(ficus, be at tropical forest)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(ficus, be at it natural habitat)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at it natural habitat)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(ficus, be at it natural habitat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at rainforest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(ficus, be at rainforest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(tree, be at rainforest)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(tree, be at in forest)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(tree, be a part of forest)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(tree, be find in forest)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(plant, be find in forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(apple tree, be at it natural habitat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(tree, be at rainforest)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(tree, be at in forest)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(tree, be a part of forest)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(tree, be find in forest)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(plant, be find in forest)