ficus: be at tropical forest

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tree
Weight: 0.72
, plant
Weight: 0.61
, shrub
Weight: 0.46
, variety
Weight: 0.37
, member
Weight: 0.28
Siblings oak tree
Weight: 0.38
, cherry tree
Weight: 0.38
, apple tree
Weight: 0.38
, maple tree
Weight: 0.38
, christmas tree
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at tropical forest 1.00
be at tropical rainforest 0.94
be at in forest 0.88
be at tropical region 0.88
be at tropical landscape 0.87
be a part of forest 0.87
be find in forest 0.86
be at rainforest 0.85
be at tropical zone 0.83
has fall down in forest 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(plant, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ficus, be at tropical forest)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tree, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ficus, be at tropical forest)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(tree, be a part of forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ficus, be at tropical forest)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ficus, be at tropical forest)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ficus, be at tropical forest)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tree, be at rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ficus, be at tropical forest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(tree, be a part of forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(tree, be find in forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(tree, be at rainforest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tree, be at in forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(plant, be find in forest)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(tree, has fall down in forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(plant, be find in forest)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at rainforest)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in forest)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tree, be a part of forest)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tree, be find in forest)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tree, has fall down in forest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tree, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at tropical forest)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(plant, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at tropical forest)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(tree, be a part of forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at tropical forest)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at tropical forest)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tree, be at rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at tropical forest)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at tropical forest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(ficus, be at tropical forest)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at tropical rainforest)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(ficus, be at tropical rainforest)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at rainforest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical rainforest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ficus, be at tropical rainforest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(ficus, be at tropical zone)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(ficus, be at tropical region)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(ficus, be at tropical region)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(ficus, be at rainforest)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ficus, be at rainforest)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at rainforest)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical zone)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(ficus, be at tropical zone)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical region)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at tropical zone)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at tropical region)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ficus, be at tropical forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tree, be at in forest)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tree, be a part of forest)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(tree, be find in forest)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(plant, be find in forest)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tree, has fall down in forest)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tree, be at rainforest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tree, be at in forest)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tree, be a part of forest)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(tree, be find in forest)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tree, has fall down in forest)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(plant, be find in forest)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tree, be at rainforest)