fig: fall off tree

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit
Weight: 0.67
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.64
, crop
Weight: 0.59
, plant
Weight: 0.57
Siblings apple tree
Weight: 0.37
, pear tree
Weight: 0.37
, peach tree
Weight: 0.37
, pear
Weight: 0.36
, grape
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
fall off tree 1.00
split on tree 0.86
is tree israel 0.77
fall off before ripe 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fig, fall off tree)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pear, fall off tree)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fig, fall off tree)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pear, split on tree)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fig, fall off tree)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(pear, fall off tree)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(pear, fall off tree)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fig, fall off tree)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(pear, split on tree)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(pear, split on tree)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fig, fall off tree)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(fig, fall off tree)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(fig, fall off tree)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(fig, split on tree)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(fig, fall off tree)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fig, split on tree)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fig, fall off tree)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fig, split on tree)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(fig, fall off tree)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(fig, is tree israel)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fig, fall off tree)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(fig, is tree israel)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(fig, fall off tree)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(fig, split on tree)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(fig, fall off tree)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(fig, fall off before ripe)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(fig, fall off tree)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(fig, is tree israel)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(fig, fall off tree)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fig, is tree israel)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(fig, fall off tree)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(fig, fall off before ripe)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fig, fall off tree)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fig, fall off before ripe)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(fig, fall off tree)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fig, fall off before ripe)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(fig, fall off tree)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fig, fall off tree)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fig, fall off tree)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fig, fall off tree)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fig, fall off tree)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fig, fall off tree)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(pear, fall off tree)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fig, fall off tree)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(pear, split on tree)