fig: have many calories

Related concepts

Parents	fruit Weight: 0.67 , fruit tree Weight: 0.64 , crop Weight: 0.59 , plant Weight: 0.57
Siblings	apple tree Weight: 0.37 , pear tree Weight: 0.37 , peach tree Weight: 0.37 , pear Weight: 0.36 , grape Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
have many calories	1.00
have calories	0.98
have more calories	0.97
be high in calories	0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(fig, have many calories) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(pear, be high in calories)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(fig, have many calories) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(pear, be high in calories) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(pear, be high in calories)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(fig, have many calories) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(fig, have many calories)

Similarity expansion

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(fig, have many calories) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(fig, have calories)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(fig, have many calories) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(fig, have more calories)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(fig, have many calories) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(fig, have calories)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.69

Salient(fig, have many calories) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(fig, have more calories)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.69

Salient(fig, have many calories) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(fig, have calories)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.69

Salient(fig, have many calories) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(fig, be high in calories)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(fig, have many calories) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(fig, be high in calories)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(fig, have many calories) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(fig, have more calories)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(fig, have many calories) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(fig, be high in calories)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(fig, have many calories) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(fig, be high in calories)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(fig, have many calories) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(fig, have calories)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(fig, have many calories) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(fig, have more calories)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

Salient(fig, have many calories) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(fig, have many calories) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(fig, have many calories)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(fig, have many calories) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(fig, have many calories)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(fig, have many calories) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(pear, be high in calories)