fight: be with cecil jacobs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scene
Weight: 0.60
, challenge
Weight: 0.59
, confrontation
Weight: 0.59
, situation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings strike
Weight: 0.60
, win
Weight: 0.59
, skirmish
Weight: 0.47
, lorie
Weight: 0.35
, battle
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with cecil jacobs 1.00
be with johnson 0.84
be with francis 0.82
be in barcelona 0.81
be in billy elliot 0.81
be in michigan 0.79
be in seattle r 0.78
be in freddy 0.78
be in chicago 0.77
be at lexington 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fight, be with cecil jacobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(strike, be in barcelona)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fight, be with cecil jacobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(strike, be in billy elliot)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fight, be with cecil jacobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(strike, be in michigan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fight, be with cecil jacobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(strike, be in chicago)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(fight, be with cecil jacobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(strike, be in barcelona) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(strike, be in barcelona)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(fight, be with cecil jacobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(strike, be in billy elliot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(strike, be in billy elliot)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(fight, be with cecil jacobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(strike, be in michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(strike, be in michigan)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(fight, be with cecil jacobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(strike, be in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(strike, be in chicago)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(fight, be with cecil jacobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(fight, be with cecil jacobs)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(fight, be with cecil jacobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(fight, be with francis)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(fight, be with cecil jacobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(fight, be with johnson)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(fight, be with cecil jacobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(fight, be with johnson)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(fight, be with cecil jacobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(fight, be with francis)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(fight, be with cecil jacobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(fight, be with johnson)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(fight, be with cecil jacobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(fight, be with francis)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(fight, be with cecil jacobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(fight, be in freddy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(fight, be with cecil jacobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(fight, be with johnson)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(fight, be with cecil jacobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(fight, be in freddy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(fight, be with cecil jacobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(fight, be in freddy)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(fight, be with cecil jacobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(fight, be with francis)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(fight, be with cecil jacobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(fight, be in freddy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(fight, be with cecil jacobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fight, be with cecil jacobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fight, be with cecil jacobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(fight, be with cecil jacobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fight, be with cecil jacobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fight, be with cecil jacobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(strike, be in barcelona)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fight, be with cecil jacobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(strike, be in billy elliot)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fight, be with cecil jacobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(strike, be in michigan)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fight, be with cecil jacobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(strike, be in chicago)