fighter: fly in atmosphere

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plane
Weight: 0.63
, athlete
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, class
Weight: 0.59
Siblings boxer
Weight: 0.69
, wrestler
Weight: 0.57
, chuck
Weight: 0.54
, toby
Weight: 0.46

Related properties

Property Similarity
fly in atmosphere 1.00
fly in formation 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(plane, fly in formation)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(fighter, fly in atmosphere)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fighter, fly in atmosphere)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(plane, fly in formation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fighter, fly in atmosphere)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(plane, fly in formation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(plane, fly in formation)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(fighter, fly in atmosphere)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fighter, fly in atmosphere)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fighter, fly in atmosphere)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fighter, fly in atmosphere)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(fighter, fly in atmosphere)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fighter, fly in formation)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fighter, fly in atmosphere)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(fighter, fly in formation)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(fighter, fly in atmosphere)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(fighter, fly in formation)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fighter, fly in atmosphere)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(fighter, fly in formation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fighter, fly in atmosphere)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(fighter, fly in atmosphere)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fighter, fly in atmosphere)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fighter, fly in atmosphere)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(fighter, fly in atmosphere)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fighter, fly in atmosphere)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(plane, fly in formation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(fighter, fly in atmosphere)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(plane, fly in formation)