fighting: was between groups good for europeans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, action
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.57
Siblings battle
Weight: 0.35
, fighter
Weight: 0.33
, living thing
Weight: 0.33
, guerrilla warfare
Weight: 0.32
, playing game
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was between groups good for europeans 1.00
was between indian groups good for europeans 0.95
was between groups good 0.91
was between indian groups good 0.89
was between groups 0.88
was between indian groups 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fighting, was between indian groups good for europeans)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(fighting, was between groups good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fighting, was between indian groups good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fighting, was between indian groups)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fighting, was between groups)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(fighting, was between groups good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fighting, was between indian groups good for europeans)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fighting, was between groups)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(fighting, was between indian groups good for europeans)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(fighting, was between indian groups good for europeans)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(fighting, was between groups good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(fighting, was between groups good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(fighting, was between groups)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(fighting, was between groups)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(fighting, was between indian groups good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(fighting, was between indian groups)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(fighting, was between indian groups good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(fighting, was between indian groups good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(fighting, was between indian groups)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fighting, was between indian groups)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)