fighting: was between indian groups

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, action
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.57
Siblings battle
Weight: 0.35
, fighter
Weight: 0.33
, living thing
Weight: 0.33
, guerrilla warfare
Weight: 0.32
, playing game
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was between indian groups 1.00
was between indian groups good 0.99
was between indian groups good for europeans 0.95
was between groups good for europeans 0.87
was between groups 0.86
was between groups good 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(fighting, was between indian groups)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(fighting, was between indian groups)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(fighting, was between indian groups)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(fighting, was between indian groups good)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(fighting, was between indian groups)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fighting, was between indian groups good for europeans)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(fighting, was between indian groups)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(fighting, was between indian groups good for europeans)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(fighting, was between indian groups)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(fighting, was between indian groups good)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(fighting, was between indian groups)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(fighting, was between indian groups good)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(fighting, was between indian groups)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(fighting, was between indian groups good for europeans)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(fighting, was between indian groups)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(fighting, was between indian groups)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fighting, was between groups)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(fighting, was between indian groups)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fighting, was between indian groups good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(fighting, was between indian groups)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(fighting, was between indian groups)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(fighting, was between groups good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(fighting, was between indian groups)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(fighting, was between groups)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(fighting, was between indian groups)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(fighting, was between groups good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(fighting, was between indian groups)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(fighting, was between indian groups)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(fighting, was between groups)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(fighting, was between indian groups)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(fighting, was between groups good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(fighting, was between indian groups)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fighting, was between indian groups good for europeans)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(fighting, was between indian groups)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(fighting, was between groups good for europeans)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(fighting, was between indian groups)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(fighting, was between groups good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(fighting, was between indian groups)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fighting, was between groups)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(fighting, was between indian groups)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fighting, was between indian groups)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fighting, was between indian groups)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(fighting, was between indian groups)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fighting, was between indian groups)