fiji: be good at rugby

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents island
Weight: 0.61
, new zealand
Weight: 0.60
, country
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.54
, south africa
Weight: 0.50
Siblings zimbabwe
Weight: 0.34
, usa
Weight: 0.33
, ellis island
Weight: 0.33
, solomon islands
Weight: 0.33
, argentina
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good at rugby 1.00
be good at sevens 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(new zealand, be good at rugby)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(fiji, be good at rugby)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fiji, be good at rugby)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(new zealand, be good at rugby)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(fiji, be good at rugby)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, be good at rugby)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(fiji, be good at rugby)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(argentina, be good at rugby)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(new zealand, be good at rugby)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(fiji, be good at rugby)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(fiji, be good at rugby)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fiji, be good at rugby)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(argentina, be good at rugby)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(argentina, be good at rugby)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fiji, be good at rugby)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(fiji, be good at rugby)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fiji, be good at rugby)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fiji, be good at sevens)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(fiji, be good at rugby)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(fiji, be good at sevens)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(fiji, be good at rugby)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(fiji, be good at sevens)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(fiji, be good at rugby)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(fiji, be good at sevens)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(fiji, be good at rugby)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(fiji, be good at rugby)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(fiji, be good at rugby)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fiji, be good at rugby)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(fiji, be good at rugby)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(fiji, be good at rugby)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(new zealand, be good at rugby)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(fiji, be good at rugby)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(argentina, be good at rugby)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(fiji, be good at rugby)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(new zealand, be good at rugby)