file server: is more efficient

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents server
Weight: 0.77
, computer network
Weight: 0.72
, computer
Weight: 0.70
, device
Weight: 0.68
, machine
Weight: 0.68
Siblings terminal server
Weight: 0.39
, computer virus
Weight: 0.37
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.36
, computer programmer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more efficient 1.00
is efficient 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(machine, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(file server, is more efficient)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(file server, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(machine, is more efficient)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(file server, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(machine, is more efficient)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(machine, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(file server, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(file server, is more efficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(file server, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(file server, is more efficient)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(file server, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(file server, is efficient)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(file server, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(file server, is efficient)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(file server, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(file server, is efficient)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(file server, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(file server, is efficient)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(file server, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(file server, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(file server, is more efficient)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(file server, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(file server, is more efficient)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(file server, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(machine, is more efficient)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(file server, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(machine, is more efficient)