filing: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents document
Weight: 0.67
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.58
, function
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.55
Siblings computer file
Weight: 0.35
, affidavit
Weight: 0.34
, declaration
Weight: 0.34
, deposition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality better 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(filing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(filing, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(filing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(filing, has quality better)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(filing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(filing, has quality better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(filing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(filing, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(filing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(filing, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(filing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(filing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(filing, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(filing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(filing, has quality bad)