filling: cost more

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.56
, recipe
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, function
Weight: 0.51
, method
Weight: 0.48
Siblings lemon curd
Weight: 0.57
, mousse
Weight: 0.57
, fill
Weight: 0.35
, lining
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
cost more 1.00
is more expensive 0.85
is expensive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(filling, cost more)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(filling, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(filling, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(filling, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(filling, cost more)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(filling, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(filling, cost more)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(filling, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(filling, is more expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(filling, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(filling, is more expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(filling, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(filling, is expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(filling, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(filling, is more expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(filling, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(filling, is more expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(filling, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(filling, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(filling, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(filling, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(filling, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(filling, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(filling, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(filling, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(filling, cost more)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(filling, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(filling, cost more)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(filling, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(filling, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)