film: be better than digital

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents television series
Weight: 0.71
, adaptation
Weight: 0.68
, documentary
Weight: 0.68
, science fiction
Weight: 0.64
Siblings film maker
Weight: 0.77
, movie
Weight: 0.73
, television show
Weight: 0.70
, star trek
Weight: 0.69
, tv show
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than digital 1.00
be better than theatre 0.82
be better than books 0.78
has quality better 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(film, be better than digital)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(movie, be better than books)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(film, be better than digital)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(movie, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(film, be better than digital)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(movie, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(movie, has quality better)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(film, be better than digital)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(movie, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(movie, be better than books)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(film, be better than digital)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(film, be better than digital)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(film, be better than digital)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(film, be better than books)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(film, be better than digital)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(film, be better than books)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(film, be better than digital)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(film, be better than books)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(film, be better than digital)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(film, be better than books)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(film, be better than digital)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(film, be better than digital)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(film, be better than digital)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(film, be better than digital)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(film, be better than digital)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(film, be better than digital)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(movie, be better than books)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(film, be better than digital)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(movie, has quality better)