financial: has quality resources

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.64
, information
Weight: 0.62
, industry
Weight: 0.62
, market
Weight: 0.58
Siblings financial institution
Weight: 0.39
, banking industry
Weight: 0.37
, banking
Weight: 0.35
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.34
, financials
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality resources 1.00
has quality resource 0.91
need information resources information system 0.81
allocate efficiently resources 0.81
has quality systems 0.80
be called resource 0.80
be resource for organizations 0.80
differ in allocation of resources 0.80
be important resource of company 0.80
has quality system 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(market, differ in allocation of resources)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(financial, has quality resources)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(financial, has quality resources)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(market, differ in allocation of resources)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(financial, has quality resources)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(market, differ in allocation of resources)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(financial, has quality resources)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(banking, need information resources information system)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(financial, has quality resources)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(banking, has quality system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(market, differ in allocation of resources)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(financial, has quality resources)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(financial, has quality resources)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(financial, has quality resources)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(banking, need information resources information system)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(banking, need information resources information system)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(financial, has quality resources)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(banking, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(banking, has quality system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(financial, has quality resources)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(financial, has quality resources)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(financial, has quality resources)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(financial, has quality resources)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(financial, has quality resources)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(financial, has quality resources)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(financial, has quality resources)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(financial, has quality resources)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(market, differ in allocation of resources)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(financial, has quality resources)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(banking, has quality system)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(financial, has quality resources)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(banking, need information resources information system)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(financial, has quality resources)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(market, differ in allocation of resources)