financials: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.58
, module
Weight: 0.43
, application
Weight: 0.39
, part
Weight: 0.31
Siblings financial
Weight: 0.34
, banking industry
Weight: 0.33
, financial institution
Weight: 0.33
, oil company
Weight: 0.33
, banking
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality system 0.82
has quality worth 0.82
has quality news 0.80
be bad for environment 0.80
is bad buy 0.79
be bad for body 0.76
be terrible 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(financials, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(financials, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(part, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(financials, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(part, be bad for body)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sector, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(sector, has quality news)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(part, be bad for body)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality news)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(oil company, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil company, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(banking, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(banking, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(banking, has quality system)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(banking, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(financials, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(financials, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(part, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(financials, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(banking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(banking, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(banking, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(banking, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(oil company, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(oil company, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(banking, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(banking, has quality system)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(banking, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(banking, has quality worth)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(oil company, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(oil company, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(financials, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(financials, is bad buy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(financials, is bad buy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(financials, is bad buy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(financials, is bad buy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(financials, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(financials, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(part, be bad for body)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality news)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(banking, has quality system)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(banking, has quality worth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(banking, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(banking, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(oil company, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(oil company, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(part, be bad for body)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(financials, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality news)