financier: is important stakeholders

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.60
, man
Weight: 0.54
, capitalist
Weight: 0.49
, group
Weight: 0.47
, entrepreneur
Weight: 0.46
Siblings venture capitalist
Weight: 0.64
, businessman
Weight: 0.35
, banker
Weight: 0.34
, baron
Weight: 0.33
, investor
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is important stakeholders 1.00
is stakeholders 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(financier, is important stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(investor, is important stakeholders)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(financier, is important stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(investor, is important stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(investor, is important stakeholders)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(financier, is important stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(financier, is important stakeholders)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(financier, is important stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(financier, is stakeholders)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(financier, is important stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(financier, is stakeholders)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(financier, is important stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(financier, is stakeholders)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(financier, is important stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(financier, is stakeholders)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(financier, is important stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(financier, is important stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(financier, is important stakeholders)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(financier, is important stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(financier, is important stakeholders)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(financier, is important stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(investor, is important stakeholders)