financing: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.57
, problem
Weight: 0.57
, subject
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bridge loan
Weight: 0.64
, lease
Weight: 0.61
, mortgage lender
Weight: 0.34
, loan
Weight: 0.33
, investment
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
has quality worth 0.85
be good company work for 0.78
is good thing 0.78
be good company work 0.77
has quality definition 0.76
has quality asset 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(bridge loan, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(loan, be good company work for)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(loan, be good company work)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(investment, is good thing)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality asset)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(investment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(investment, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(loan, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(loan, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(lease, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lease, has quality better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(loan, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(investment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(investment, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(bridge loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(bridge loan, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(investment, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(investment, is good thing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(loan, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(loan, be good company work for)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(investment, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(investment, has quality asset)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(loan, be good company work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(loan, be good company work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(financing, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(financing, is good thing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(financing, is good thing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(financing, is good thing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(financing, is good thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(financing, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(financing, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(investment, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(investment, has quality asset)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(loan, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(investment, is good thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lease, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(investment, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(loan, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(lease, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(loan, be good company work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(loan, be good company work for)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bridge loan, has quality bad)