finch: have different beak types

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.57
, bird
Weight: 0.51
, songbird
Weight: 0.50
, band
Weight: 0.49
, visitor
Weight: 0.47
Siblings canary
Weight: 0.56
, chickadee
Weight: 0.45
, robin
Weight: 0.36
, zebra finch
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have different beak types 1.00
have beak types 0.99
have different beaks 0.86
have different sized beaks 0.84
have sttrong beaks 0.82
has physical part beaks 0.81
have strong beaks 0.81
have sized beaks 0.81
have beaks answers 0.80
have strong beaks answers 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(finch, have different beak types)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(finch, have different beak types)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(finch, have different beak types)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(finch, have beak types)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(finch, have beak types)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(finch, have beak types)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(finch, have different beaks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(finch, have different beaks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(finch, has physical part beaks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(finch, have different sized beaks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(finch, have different beaks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(finch, have different sized beaks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(finch, has physical part beaks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(finch, has physical part beaks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(finch, have different sized beaks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(finch, have sttrong beaks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(finch, have sttrong beaks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(finch, have sized beaks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(finch, have strong beaks answers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(finch, have strong beaks answers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(finch, have beak types)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(finch, have sized beaks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(finch, have sttrong beaks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(finch, have strong beaks)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(finch, have sized beaks)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(finch, have beaks answers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(finch, have strong beaks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(finch, have beaks answers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(finch, have different beaks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(finch, have beaks answers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(finch, have strong beaks answers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(finch, have strong beaks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(finch, have different sized beaks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(finch, have strong beaks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(finch, have sttrong beaks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(finch, have strong beaks answers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(finch, have beaks answers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(finch, has physical part beaks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(finch, have sized beaks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(finch, have different beak types)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(finch, have different beak types)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(finch, have different beak types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)