finish: be applied to kitchen utensils

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents part
Weight: 0.59
, element
Weight: 0.57
, option
Weight: 0.57
, work
Weight: 0.56
Siblings bronze
Weight: 0.63
, brass
Weight: 0.59
, chrome
Weight: 0.59
, varnish
Weight: 0.59
, shellac
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be applied to kitchen utensils 1.00
be applied to wood 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(finish, be applied to kitchen utensils)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(varnish, be applied to wood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(finish, be applied to kitchen utensils)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(varnish, be applied to wood)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(varnish, be applied to wood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(finish, be applied to kitchen utensils)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(finish, be applied to kitchen utensils)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(finish, be applied to kitchen utensils)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(finish, be applied to wood)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(finish, be applied to kitchen utensils)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(finish, be applied to wood)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(finish, be applied to kitchen utensils)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(finish, be applied to wood)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(finish, be applied to kitchen utensils)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(finish, be applied to wood)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(finish, be applied to kitchen utensils)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(finish, be applied to kitchen utensils)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(finish, be applied to kitchen utensils)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(finish, be applied to kitchen utensils)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(finish, be applied to kitchen utensils)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(finish, be applied to kitchen utensils)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(varnish, be applied to wood)