fire department: be useful

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fire
Weight: 0.85
, department
Weight: 0.78
, city hall
Weight: 0.68
, city
Weight: 0.68
Siblings police
Weight: 0.67
, firefighter
Weight: 0.64
, fire alarm
Weight: 0.42
, fire extinguisher
Weight: 0.42
, smoke alarm
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful 1.00
be very useful 0.94
be very useful for cook 0.85
be useful when something on fire 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fire, be useful)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(fire department, be useful)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fire, be very useful)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(fire department, be useful)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fire, be very useful for cook)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(fire department, be useful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(fire department, be useful)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(fire, be very useful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(fire department, be useful)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fire, be useful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(fire department, be useful)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(fire, be very useful for cook)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fire department, be useful)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fire, be very useful for cook)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fire department, be useful)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(fire, be useful)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fire department, be useful)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fire, be very useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fire department, be useful)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fire extinguisher, be useful when something on fire)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fire, be useful)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fire department, be useful)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(fire department, be useful)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fire, be very useful)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fire department, be useful)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(fire department, be useful)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fire, be very useful for cook)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fire department, be useful)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(fire department, be useful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(fire department, be useful)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(fire extinguisher, be useful when something on fire)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fire extinguisher, be useful when something on fire)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(fire department, be useful)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(fire department, be useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(fire department, be useful)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(fire department, be useful)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fire department, be useful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(fire department, be useful)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(fire department, be useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fire department, be useful)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fire, be useful)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fire department, be useful)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fire, be very useful)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fire department, be useful)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(fire, be very useful for cook)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fire department, be useful)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fire extinguisher, be useful when something on fire)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(fire department, be useful)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fire, be useful)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(fire department, be useful)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fire, be very useful)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(fire department, be useful)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(fire, be very useful for cook)