fire: be bad in california

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fire extinguisher
Weight: 0.81
, hazard
Weight: 0.65
, explosion
Weight: 0.62
, violence
Weight: 0.62
Siblings fire department
Weight: 0.85
, fire alarm
Weight: 0.84
, smoke alarm
Weight: 0.73
, fire hose
Weight: 0.70
, fire brigade
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad in california 1.00
be in california 0.98
be worse in california 0.96
happen in california 0.95
start in california 0.95
happening in california 0.90
spread quickly in california 0.90
is american 0.77
be high in chicago 0.76
be in chicago high 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(violence, be high in chicago)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(fire, be bad in california)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(violence, be high in chicago)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(violence, be high in chicago)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(violence, be high in chicago)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fire, be bad in california)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(fire, be bad in california)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fire, be worse in california)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(fire, be in california)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(fire, be worse in california)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fire, start in california)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(fire, be in california)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(fire, be worse in california)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(fire, be in california)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(fire, be worse in california)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(fire, start in california)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(fire, happen in california)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(fire, be in california)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fire, start in california)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fire, happening in california)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(fire, happen in california)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fire, happening in california)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fire, spread quickly in california)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(fire, spread quickly in california)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fire, start in california)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(fire, happening in california)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(fire, happen in california)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(fire, happening in california)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(fire, happen in california)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(fire, spread quickly in california)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(fire, spread quickly in california)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fire, be bad in california)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(fire, be bad in california)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(violence, be high in chicago)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(fire, be bad in california)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(violence, be high in chicago)