fire: was important to people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fire extinguisher
Weight: 0.81
, hazard
Weight: 0.65
, explosion
Weight: 0.62
, violence
Weight: 0.62
Siblings fire department
Weight: 0.85
, fire alarm
Weight: 0.84
, smoke alarm
Weight: 0.73
, fire hose
Weight: 0.70
, fire brigade
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to people 1.00
be bad for people 0.85
affect people 0.81
was important for evolution 0.76
hurt people 0.76
was important for human evolution 0.76
be important to to society 0.76
be more important than water 0.76
is nessasary 0.75
is dangrous 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.08
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(violence, affect people)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fire, was important to people)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(fire, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(violence, affect people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fire, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(violence, affect people)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(violence, affect people)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fire, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(fire, was important to people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(fire, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(fire, was important to people)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(fire, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(fire, be bad for people)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(fire, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(fire, be bad for people)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(fire, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(fire, be bad for people)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(fire, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(fire, affect people)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(fire, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fire, affect people)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fire, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(fire, be bad for people)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(fire, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fire, affect people)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(fire, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(fire, hurt people)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(fire, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fire, hurt people)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(fire, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(fire, be more important than water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(fire, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(fire, be more important than water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(fire, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(fire, be more important than water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(fire, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fire, hurt people)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fire, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fire, be more important than water)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fire, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fire, hurt people)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fire, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fire, affect people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(fire, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fire, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fire, was important to people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(fire, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fire, was important to people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fire, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(violence, affect people)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(fire, was important to people)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(violence, affect people)