fireman: has state job

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.65
, job
Weight: 0.64
, public servant
Weight: 0.64
, worker
Weight: 0.63
Siblings firefighter
Weight: 0.38
, policeman
Weight: 0.35
, construction worker
Weight: 0.35
, office worker
Weight: 0.34
, plumber
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state job 1.00
sleep on job 0.82
have 2 jobs 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(worker, has state job)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fireman, has state job)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fireman, has state job)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(worker, has state job)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fireman, has state job)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(worker, has state job)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fireman, has state job)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, has state job)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(worker, has state job)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(fireman, has state job)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(fireman, has state job)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fireman, has state job)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(construction worker, has state job)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(construction worker, has state job)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fireman, has state job)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(fireman, has state job)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fireman, has state job)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fireman, sleep on job)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(fireman, has state job)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(fireman, sleep on job)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(fireman, has state job)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(fireman, sleep on job)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fireman, has state job)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fireman, sleep on job)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fireman, has state job)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(fireman, have 2 jobs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fireman, has state job)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(fireman, have 2 jobs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(fireman, has state job)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(fireman, have 2 jobs)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(fireman, has state job)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fireman, have 2 jobs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(fireman, has state job)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fireman, has state job)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fireman, has state job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fireman, has state job)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fireman, has state job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fireman, has state job)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(worker, has state job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fireman, has state job)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(construction worker, has state job)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(fireman, has state job)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(worker, has state job)