firewall: be important to companies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents security system
Weight: 0.69
, network device
Weight: 0.67
, hardware
Weight: 0.62
, application
Weight: 0.62
Siblings gas pedal
Weight: 0.50
, computer network
Weight: 0.36
, router
Weight: 0.36
, server
Weight: 0.35
, security guard
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to companies 1.00
be important in business 0.82
be important for business 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hardware, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(firewall, be important to companies)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(firewall, be important to companies)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(hardware, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(firewall, be important to companies)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hardware, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(firewall, be important to companies)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(firewall, be important to companies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(firewall, be important to companies)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(firewall, be important to companies)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(firewall, be important to companies)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(firewall, be important for business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(firewall, be important to companies)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(firewall, be important for business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(firewall, be important to companies)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(firewall, be important for business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(firewall, be important to companies)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(firewall, be important for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(firewall, be important to companies)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(firewall, be important to companies)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(firewall, be important to companies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(firewall, be important to companies)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(firewall, be important to companies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(firewall, be important to companies)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(hardware, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(firewall, be important to companies)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(hardware, be important in business)