firewall: be needed in computer networks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents security system
Weight: 0.69
, network device
Weight: 0.67
, hardware
Weight: 0.62
, application
Weight: 0.62
Siblings gas pedal
Weight: 0.50
, computer network
Weight: 0.36
, router
Weight: 0.36
, server
Weight: 0.35
, security guard
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be needed in computer networks 1.00
be used in networks 0.91
be established between computer networks 0.90
be needed in computer 0.90
have 2 networks 0.89
show 2 networks 0.86
be important to computer 0.85
is computer 0.84
get names of devices on network 0.83
be called computers 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(hardware, be needed in computer)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(firewall, be needed in computer networks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(hardware, be needed in computer)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hardware, be important to computer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be important to computer)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be needed in computer)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(router, show 2 networks)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(router, get names of devices on network)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(router, have 2 networks)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(router, be used in networks)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(router, is computer)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(server, be called computers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(hardware, be needed in computer)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hardware, be important to computer)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(firewall, be needed in computer networks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(router, be used in networks)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(router, have 2 networks)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(router, have 2 networks)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(router, is computer)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(router, is computer)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(server, be called computers)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(server, be called computers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(router, show 2 networks)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(router, show 2 networks)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(router, get names of devices on network)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(router, get names of devices on network)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(firewall, be needed in computer networks)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(firewall, be established between computer networks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(firewall, be established between computer networks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(firewall, be established between computer networks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(firewall, be established between computer networks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(firewall, be needed in computer networks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(firewall, be needed in computer networks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(hardware, be needed in computer)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(hardware, be important to computer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(router, be used in networks)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(router, is computer)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(router, have 2 networks)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(server, be called computers)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(router, show 2 networks)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(router, get names of devices on network)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(hardware, be needed in computer)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(firewall, be needed in computer networks)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(hardware, be important to computer)