firm: go public evidence from banking industry

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents law firm
Weight: 0.81
, financial institution
Weight: 0.61
, institution
Weight: 0.58
, member
Weight: 0.57
Siblings software company
Weight: 0.70
, ubs
Weight: 0.64
, vanguard
Weight: 0.58
, boeing
Weight: 0.57
, renault
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
go public evidence from banking industry 1.00
go evidence from banking industry 0.98
go public evidence 0.84
form new banking relationships 0.80
form banking relationships 0.79
be important to financial system 0.77
go evidence 0.77
go public 0.77
go public brau 0.77
need finance 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(institution, be important to financial system)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(law firm, go public)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(law firm, go public)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(institution, be important to financial system)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(law firm, go public)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(institution, be important to financial system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(institution, be important to financial system)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(law firm, go public)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(firm, go public)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(firm, go public)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(firm, go public)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(firm, go public)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(law firm, go public)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(institution, be important to financial system)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(law firm, go public)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(firm, go public evidence from banking industry)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(institution, be important to financial system)