firm: have functional area

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents law firm
Weight: 0.81
, financial institution
Weight: 0.61
, institution
Weight: 0.58
, member
Weight: 0.57
Siblings software company
Weight: 0.70
, ubs
Weight: 0.64
, vanguard
Weight: 0.58
, boeing
Weight: 0.57
, renault
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
have functional area 1.00
has physical part area 0.80
affect urban areas 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(institution, affect urban areas)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(firm, have functional area)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(firm, have functional area)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(institution, affect urban areas)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(firm, have functional area)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(institution, affect urban areas)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(institution, affect urban areas)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(firm, have functional area)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(firm, have functional area)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(firm, have functional area)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(firm, have functional area)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(firm, have functional area)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(firm, have functional area)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(firm, have functional area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(firm, have functional area)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(firm, have functional area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(firm, have functional area)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(institution, affect urban areas)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(firm, have functional area)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(institution, affect urban areas)