firm: need funding

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents law firm
Weight: 0.81
, financial institution
Weight: 0.61
, institution
Weight: 0.58
, member
Weight: 0.57
Siblings software company
Weight: 0.70
, ubs
Weight: 0.64
, vanguard
Weight: 0.58
, boeing
Weight: 0.57
, renault
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
need funding 1.00
need money 0.81
need term financing 0.81
raise funds 0.79
need short term financing 0.78
prepare cash budget 0.78
closed funds 0.78
need resources 0.77
budget 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(firm, need funding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(vanguard, closed funds)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(firm, need funding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(vanguard, closed funds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(vanguard, closed funds)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(firm, need funding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(firm, need funding)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(firm, need funding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(firm, need resources)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(firm, need funding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(firm, budget)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(firm, need funding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(firm, need money)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(firm, need funding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(firm, budget)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(firm, need funding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(firm, need resources)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(firm, need funding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(firm, budget)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(firm, need funding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(firm, need resources)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(firm, need funding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(firm, need resources)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(firm, need funding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(firm, need money)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(firm, need funding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(firm, budget)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(firm, need funding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(firm, need money)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(firm, need funding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(firm, need money)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(firm, need funding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(firm, need funding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(firm, need funding)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(firm, need funding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(firm, need funding)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(firm, need funding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(vanguard, closed funds)