firm: spend money on costly innovation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents law firm
Weight: 0.81
, financial institution
Weight: 0.61
, institution
Weight: 0.58
, member
Weight: 0.57
Siblings software company
Weight: 0.70
, ubs
Weight: 0.64
, vanguard
Weight: 0.58
, boeing
Weight: 0.57
, renault
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
spend money on costly innovation 1.00
spend money on innovation 0.95
spend money 0.84
go for cost 0.80
is expensive 0.80
need money 0.79
make money 0.79
get money 0.78
innovate 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(firm, spend money on costly innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(vanguard, go for cost)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(firm, spend money on costly innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(software company, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(firm, spend money on costly innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(software company, make money)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(firm, spend money on costly innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(vanguard, go for cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(vanguard, go for cost)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(firm, spend money on costly innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(software company, make money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(software company, make money)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(firm, spend money on costly innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(software company, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(software company, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(firm, spend money on costly innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(firm, spend money on costly innovation)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(firm, spend money on costly innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(firm, spend money)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(firm, spend money on costly innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(firm, spend money)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(firm, spend money on costly innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(firm, spend money)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(firm, spend money on costly innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(firm, need money)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(firm, spend money on costly innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(firm, need money)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(firm, spend money on costly innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(firm, need money)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(firm, spend money on costly innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(firm, spend money)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(firm, spend money on costly innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(firm, need money)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(firm, spend money on costly innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(firm, spend money on costly innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(firm, spend money on costly innovation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(firm, spend money on costly innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(firm, spend money on costly innovation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(firm, spend money on costly innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(vanguard, go for cost)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(firm, spend money on costly innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(software company, make money)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(firm, spend money on costly innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(software company, is expensive)