fish: be at fish tank

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vertebrate
Weight: 0.65
, shallow water
Weight: 0.64
, creature
Weight: 0.64
, wildlife
Weight: 0.63
Siblings whale shark
Weight: 0.74
, chinook salmon
Weight: 0.73
, catfish
Weight: 0.72
, sailfish
Weight: 0.72
, seahorse
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at fish tank 1.00
be at tank 0.93
be used to frog tank 0.88
be fish 0.83
requires fish in water 0.83
be used to fish 0.82
requires fish 0.81
requires fish in body of water 0.80
requires go fish 0.79
be fish from sea 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(shallow water, be used to frog tank)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(fish, be at fish tank)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(shallow water, be used to fish)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(fish, be at fish tank)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fish, be at fish tank)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(shallow water, be used to frog tank)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fish, be at fish tank)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(shallow water, be used to fish)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at fish tank)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(shallow water, be used to frog tank)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at fish tank)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(shallow water, be used to fish)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at fish tank)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(catfish, be fish)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(shallow water, be used to frog tank)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(fish, be at fish tank)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(fish, be at fish tank)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(shallow water, be used to fish)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(fish, be at fish tank)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(fish, be at fish tank)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fish, be at fish tank)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(catfish, be fish)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(catfish, be fish)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fish, be at fish tank)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(fish, be at fish tank)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(fish, be at fish tank)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at tank)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fish, be at fish tank)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(fish, be at tank)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(fish, be at fish tank)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(fish, be at tank)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(fish, be at fish tank)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(fish, requires fish in body of water)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(fish, be at fish tank)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fish, requires fish in body of water)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(fish, be at fish tank)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(fish, requires fish in body of water)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fish, be at fish tank)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(fish, requires fish in body of water)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(fish, be at fish tank)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(fish, be at tank)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(fish, be at fish tank)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(fish, be at fish tank)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at fish tank)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fish, be at fish tank)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(fish, be at fish tank)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at fish tank)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(shallow water, be used to fish)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at fish tank)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(shallow water, be used to frog tank)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at fish tank)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(catfish, be fish)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(fish, be at fish tank)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(shallow water, be used to fish)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(fish, be at fish tank)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(shallow water, be used to frog tank)