fish: be considered animal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ecosystem
Weight: 0.65
, vertebrate
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.64
Siblings smallmouth bass
Weight: 0.84
, rainbow trout
Weight: 0.84
, atlantic salmon
Weight: 0.79
, sturgeon
Weight: 0.79
, walleye
Weight: 0.78

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered animal 1.00
is called-blooded animals 0.86
is animals 0.86
be different to animals 0.84
be such good food for animals 0.83
be different to other animals 0.82
be classified as animals 0.81
benefit other animals 0.79
is cats ' food 0.79
benefit animals 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(vertebrate, is animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(fish, be considered animal)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fish, be considered animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, is animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(fish, be considered animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, is animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(vertebrate, is animals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(fish, be considered animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(fish, be considered animal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fish, be considered animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(fish, be considered animal)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(fish, be considered animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fish, is animals)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(fish, be considered animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(fish, is animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fish, be considered animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(fish, is animals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(fish, be considered animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fish, is animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(fish, be considered animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(fish, be considered animal) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(fish, be considered animal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fish, be considered animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(fish, be considered animal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(fish, be considered animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(vertebrate, is animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(fish, be considered animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(vertebrate, is animals)