fishing rod: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fishing
Weight: 0.80
, rod
Weight: 0.73
, hunting
Weight: 0.67
, tool
Weight: 0.62
Siblings fishing line
Weight: 0.40
, bait
Weight: 0.35
, reel
Weight: 0.35
, walleye
Weight: 0.34
, sinker
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality good 0.85
has quality better 0.83
has quality bad 0.82
is value 0.79
has quality wrong 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(fishing rod, has quality worth)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fishing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(fishing rod, has quality worth)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(fishing rod, has quality worth)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(hunting, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(fishing rod, has quality worth)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hunting, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(fishing rod, has quality worth)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(hunting, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(fishing rod, has quality worth)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fishing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(fishing rod, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fishing, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(hunting, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(hunting, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fishing, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(hunting, has quality wrong)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fishing, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hunting, has quality wrong)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hunting, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fishing, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hunting, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(walleye, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(reel, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fishing line, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(reel, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(fishing rod, has quality worth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fishing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(fishing rod, has quality worth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(fishing rod, has quality worth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(hunting, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(fishing rod, has quality worth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hunting, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(fishing rod, has quality worth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fishing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(fishing rod, has quality worth)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(hunting, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(fishing rod, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(reel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(reel, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(fishing line, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fishing line, has quality better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(reel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(reel, has quality better)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(walleye, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(walleye, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(fishing rod, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(fishing rod, is value)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, is value)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(fishing rod, is value)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fishing rod, is value)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(fishing rod, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fishing, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(hunting, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hunting, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hunting, has quality wrong)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fishing, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(reel, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fishing line, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(reel, has quality better)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(walleye, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hunting, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fishing, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(hunting, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fishing, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(fishing rod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hunting, has quality wrong)