fishing rod: is japan

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fishing
Weight: 0.80
, rod
Weight: 0.73
, hunting
Weight: 0.67
, tool
Weight: 0.62
Siblings fishing line
Weight: 0.40
, bait
Weight: 0.35
, reel
Weight: 0.35
, walleye
Weight: 0.34
, sinker
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is japan 1.00
is popular in japan 0.95
is very popular in japan 0.91
is europe 0.80
be in india 0.79
be in usa 0.79
be in africa 0.77
be in uk 0.75
be to washington 0.75
is evans 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(fishing, is europe)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fishing rod, is japan)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fishing, is very popular in japan)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fishing rod, is japan)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hunting, be in india)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fishing rod, is japan)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hunting, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fishing rod, is japan)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(hunting, be in africa)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fishing rod, is japan)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(rod, is evans)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fishing rod, is japan)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(hunting, be in usa)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fishing rod, is japan)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(fishing, be to washington)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fishing rod, is japan)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(hunting, be in usa)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(fishing, be to washington)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fishing, is very popular in japan)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(rod, is evans)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(hunting, be in africa)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hunting, be in india)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(fishing, is europe)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(hunting, be in uk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fishing, is very popular in japan)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be in usa)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be to washington)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be in africa)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be in india)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fishing, is europe)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be in uk)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(rod, is evans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fishing, is very popular in japan)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(fishing rod, is japan)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(fishing, is europe)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(fishing rod, is japan)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hunting, be in india)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(fishing rod, is japan)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hunting, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(fishing rod, is japan)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(hunting, be in africa)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(fishing rod, is japan)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(rod, is evans)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(fishing rod, is japan)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(hunting, be in usa)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(fishing rod, is japan)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(fishing, be to washington)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(fishing rod, is japan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(fishing rod, is japan)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, is japan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fishing rod, is japan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(rod, is evans)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(hunting, be in usa)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(fishing, be to washington)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fishing, is very popular in japan)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(hunting, be in africa)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hunting, be in uk)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(fishing, is europe)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(hunting, be in india)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fishing, is very popular in japan)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(rod, is evans)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(hunting, be in usa)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(fishing, be to washington)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(hunting, be in africa)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(fishing, is europe)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(hunting, be in india)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(fishing rod, is japan)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hunting, be in uk)