fishing: be in alaska

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents water sport
Weight: 0.69
, attraction
Weight: 0.63
, canoe
Weight: 0.62
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, hobby
Weight: 0.60
Siblings boating
Weight: 0.38
, scuba diving
Weight: 0.35
, rafting
Weight: 0.35
, sailing
Weight: 0.35
, canoeing
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in alaska 1.00
be in hawaii 0.81
is utah 0.81
is colorado 0.81
be in hawaii good 0.80
is virginia 0.80
be in bahamas 0.78
important to florida 0.78
be to washington 0.78
be in iceland 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(scuba diving, be in hawaii)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(scuba diving, be in hawaii good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(rafting, is utah)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rafting, is virginia)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(rafting, is colorado)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(scuba diving, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(scuba diving, be in hawaii)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(scuba diving, be in hawaii good)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(scuba diving, be in hawaii good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(rafting, is utah)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(rafting, is utah)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(rafting, is colorado)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(rafting, is colorado)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(rafting, is virginia)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(rafting, is virginia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(fishing, be in alaska)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(fishing, be to washington)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(fishing, be to washington)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(fishing, be to washington)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fishing, be in bahamas)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(fishing, be in bahamas)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(fishing, be in bahamas)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fishing, important to florida)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fishing, be in iceland)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be to washington)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be in bahamas)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fishing, be in iceland)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fishing, important to florida)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(fishing, be in iceland)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(fishing, important to florida)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fishing, important to florida)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be in iceland)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be in alaska)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fishing, be in alaska)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(scuba diving, be in hawaii)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(scuba diving, be in hawaii good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(rafting, is utah)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(rafting, is virginia)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be in alaska)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(rafting, is colorado)