fitness: be measured in theory

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.60
, magazine
Weight: 0.59
, field
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, goal
Weight: 0.58
Siblings air conditioning
Weight: 0.34
, training
Weight: 0.33
, nutrition
Weight: 0.33
, football field
Weight: 0.32
, motivation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be measured in theory 1.00
be measured in theory of selection 0.91
be measured in theory of natural selection 0.89
be measured 0.86
set theory important 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(goal, set theory important)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fitness, be measured in theory)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(fitness, be measured in theory)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(goal, set theory important)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be measured in theory)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(goal, set theory important)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(goal, set theory important)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(fitness, be measured in theory)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(fitness, be measured in theory)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(fitness, be measured in theory)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(fitness, be measured in theory)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(fitness, be measured in theory)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(fitness, be measured in theory of selection)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(fitness, be measured in theory)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be measured in theory of selection)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(fitness, be measured in theory)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be measured in theory of natural selection)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(fitness, be measured in theory)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(fitness, be measured in theory of natural selection)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(fitness, be measured in theory)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be measured)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(fitness, be measured in theory)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fitness, be measured)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(fitness, be measured in theory)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(fitness, be measured in theory of selection)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(fitness, be measured in theory)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(fitness, be measured in theory of natural selection)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(fitness, be measured in theory)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(fitness, be measured)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fitness, be measured in theory)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(fitness, be measured in theory of natural selection)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fitness, be measured in theory)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(fitness, be measured in theory of selection)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fitness, be measured in theory)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(fitness, be measured)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fitness, be measured in theory)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fitness, be measured in theory)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be measured in theory)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(fitness, be measured in theory)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fitness, be measured in theory)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be measured in theory)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(goal, set theory important)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(fitness, be measured in theory)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(goal, set theory important)