fitness: be measured in theory of selection

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.60
, magazine
Weight: 0.59
, field
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, goal
Weight: 0.58
Siblings air conditioning
Weight: 0.34
, training
Weight: 0.33
, nutrition
Weight: 0.33
, football field
Weight: 0.32
, motivation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be measured in theory of selection 1.00
be measured in theory of natural selection 0.97
be measured in theory 0.91
be related selection 0.81
set theory important 0.81
relate to natural selection 0.79
be measured 0.79
relate to selection 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(goal, set theory important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(fitness, be measured in theory of selection)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(goal, set theory important)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(goal, set theory important)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(goal, set theory important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(fitness, be measured in theory of selection)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(fitness, be measured in theory of selection)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be measured in theory of natural selection)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be measured in theory)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(fitness, be measured in theory of natural selection)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be related selection)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fitness, relate to natural selection)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(fitness, be measured in theory of natural selection)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fitness, be measured in theory)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be measured)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(fitness, relate to selection)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(fitness, be measured in theory of natural selection)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(fitness, be measured in theory)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fitness, relate to selection)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(fitness, be measured in theory)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fitness, be measured)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(fitness, relate to natural selection)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fitness, relate to natural selection)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(fitness, be measured)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(fitness, relate to selection)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(fitness, relate to selection)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(fitness, relate to natural selection)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(fitness, be measured)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(fitness, be related selection)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(fitness, be related selection)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(fitness, be related selection)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be measured in theory of selection)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(fitness, be measured in theory of selection)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(goal, set theory important)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(fitness, be measured in theory of selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(goal, set theory important)