fitness: be related selection

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.60
, magazine
Weight: 0.59
, field
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, goal
Weight: 0.58
Siblings air conditioning
Weight: 0.34
, training
Weight: 0.33
, nutrition
Weight: 0.33
, football field
Weight: 0.32
, motivation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related selection 1.00
relate to selection 0.92
relate to natural selection 0.88
be measured in theory of selection 0.81
be measured in theory of natural selection 0.80
be related 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(fitness, be related selection)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(factor, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(nutrition, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(fitness, be related selection)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(nutrition, be related)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(nutrition, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(fitness, be related selection)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fitness, relate to selection)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(fitness, relate to selection)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(fitness, relate to selection)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(fitness, relate to natural selection)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fitness, relate to natural selection)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(fitness, relate to natural selection)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(fitness, be measured in theory of selection)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(fitness, relate to selection)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fitness, relate to natural selection)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(fitness, be measured in theory of natural selection)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(fitness, be measured in theory of selection)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(fitness, be measured in theory of natural selection)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(fitness, be measured in theory of selection)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(fitness, be measured in theory of natural selection)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be measured in theory of natural selection)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be measured in theory of selection)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(fitness, be related)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be related)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(fitness, be related)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(fitness, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be related selection)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(fitness, be related selection)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(nutrition, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(fitness, be related selection)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)