fitness: be separated into ten different components

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.60
, magazine
Weight: 0.59
, field
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, goal
Weight: 0.58
Siblings air conditioning
Weight: 0.34
, training
Weight: 0.33
, nutrition
Weight: 0.33
, football field
Weight: 0.32
, motivation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be separated into ten different components 1.00
be separated into ten components 0.99
be related to other components 0.81
be related to components 0.79
be different from factors pairs 0.77
be different from factor pairs 0.77
be different 0.77
be different from past 0.75
CAN can created between three portals 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(magazine, be different from past)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(factor, be different)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(factor, be different from factors pairs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(factor, be different from factor pairs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fitness, be separated into ten different components)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(factor, be different from factor pairs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(factor, be different from factors pairs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(factor, be different)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(magazine, be different from past)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(factor, be different from factor pairs)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(magazine, be different from past)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(factor, be different)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(factor, be different from factors pairs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(training, be different)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(magazine, be different from past)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(factor, be different)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(factor, be different from factors pairs)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(factor, be different from factor pairs)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(fitness, be separated into ten different components)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(training, be different)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(training, be different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(fitness, be separated into ten different components)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(fitness, be separated into ten components)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(fitness, be separated into ten components)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(fitness, be separated into ten components)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be separated into ten components)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be separated into ten different components)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fitness, be separated into ten different components)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(factor, be different from factors pairs)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(factor, be different from factor pairs)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(factor, be different)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(magazine, be different from past)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(training, be different)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(factor, be different from factors pairs)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(factor, be different from factor pairs)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(factor, be different)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(fitness, be separated into ten different components)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(magazine, be different from past)