fix computer: requires tool

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
requires tool 1.00
requires small tool 0.94
requires knowledge and tool 0.93
requires good knowledge and some basic tool 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(fix computer, requires tool)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(fix computer, requires tool)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(fix computer, requires tool)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(fix computer, requires small tool)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(fix computer, requires tool)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(fix computer, requires knowledge and tool)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(fix computer, requires tool)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(fix computer, requires small tool)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(fix computer, requires tool)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(fix computer, requires knowledge and tool)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(fix computer, requires tool)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(fix computer, requires small tool)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(fix computer, requires tool)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(fix computer, requires knowledge and tool)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(fix computer, requires tool)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(fix computer, requires good knowledge and some basic tool)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(fix computer, requires tool)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(fix computer, requires good knowledge and some basic tool)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(fix computer, requires tool)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(fix computer, requires good knowledge and some basic tool)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(fix computer, requires tool)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fix computer, requires knowledge and tool)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(fix computer, requires tool)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fix computer, requires small tool)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(fix computer, requires tool)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fix computer, requires good knowledge and some basic tool)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(fix computer, requires tool)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fix computer, requires tool)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(fix computer, requires tool)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(fix computer, requires tool)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fix computer, requires tool)