fixture: get hot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, element
Weight: 0.58
, apparatus
Weight: 0.54
, product
Weight: 0.54
Siblings light switch
Weight: 0.63
, shower head
Weight: 0.61
, chandelier
Weight: 0.59
, display cabinet
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
get hot 1.00
is hot 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(fixture, get hot)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(light switch, get hot)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(fixture, get hot)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(light switch, is hot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fixture, get hot)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(light switch, get hot)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(light switch, get hot)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fixture, get hot)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(light switch, is hot)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(light switch, is hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fixture, get hot)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(fixture, get hot)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(fixture, get hot)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fixture, is hot)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(fixture, get hot)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(fixture, is hot)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fixture, get hot)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fixture, is hot)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(fixture, get hot)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fixture, is hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(fixture, get hot)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(fixture, get hot)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(fixture, get hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fixture, get hot)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(fixture, get hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(fixture, get hot)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(light switch, get hot)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(fixture, get hot)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(light switch, is hot)