flame: heat pot of water

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.59
, band
Weight: 0.56
, attack
Weight: 0.55
, tool
Weight: 0.53
, virus
Weight: 0.53
Siblings torch
Weight: 0.63
, lighter
Weight: 0.51
, bunsen burner
Weight: 0.49
, moth
Weight: 0.32
, smoke alarm
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
heat pot of water 1.00
heat liquid 0.84
heat room 0.82
heat metal pan 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(flame, heat pot of water)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bunsen burner, heat liquid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(flame, heat pot of water)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(bunsen burner, heat liquid)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(bunsen burner, heat liquid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(flame, heat pot of water)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(flame, heat pot of water)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(flame, heat pot of water)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(flame, heat metal pan)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(flame, heat pot of water)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(flame, heat metal pan)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(flame, heat pot of water)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(flame, heat room)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(flame, heat pot of water)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(flame, heat metal pan)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(flame, heat pot of water)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(flame, heat room)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(flame, heat pot of water)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(flame, heat room)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(flame, heat pot of water)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(flame, heat metal pan)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(flame, heat pot of water)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(flame, heat room)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(flame, heat pot of water)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(flame, heat pot of water)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(flame, heat pot of water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(flame, heat pot of water)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(flame, heat pot of water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(flame, heat pot of water)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(bunsen burner, heat liquid)