flap: be in men 's underwear

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, application
Weight: 0.49
, function
Weight: 0.49
Siblings friction
Weight: 0.31
, zipper
Weight: 0.31
, nipple
Weight: 0.31
, wrinkle
Weight: 0.31
, scandal
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in men 's underwear 1.00
be in women 's underwear 0.98
be in underwear 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(flap, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(flap, be in men 's underwear)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(flap, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(flap, be in underwear)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(flap, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(flap, be in underwear)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(flap, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(flap, be in underwear)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(flap, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(flap, be in women 's underwear)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(flap, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(flap, be in women 's underwear)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(flap, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(flap, be in underwear)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(flap, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(flap, be in women 's underwear)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(flap, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(flap, be in women 's underwear)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(flap, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(flap, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(flap, be in men 's underwear)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(flap, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(flap, be in men 's underwear)