flat: be in leasehold

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents accessory
Weight: 0.56
, area
Weight: 0.56
, property
Weight: 0.56
, item
Weight: 0.55
Siblings terraced house
Weight: 0.55
, loafer
Weight: 0.44
, bed sheet
Weight: 0.32
, apartment building
Weight: 0.31
, clean room
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in leasehold 1.00
is leasehold 1.00
be in london leasehold 0.92
have leases 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(property, be in london leasehold)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(flat, be in leasehold)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(flat, be in leasehold)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(property, be in london leasehold)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(flat, be in leasehold)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(property, be in london leasehold)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(property, be in london leasehold)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(flat, be in leasehold)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(flat, be in leasehold)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(flat, be in leasehold)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(flat, be in leasehold)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(flat, be in leasehold)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(flat, be in london leasehold)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(flat, be in leasehold)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(flat, be in london leasehold)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(flat, be in leasehold)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(flat, be in london leasehold)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(flat, be in leasehold)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(flat, is leasehold)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(flat, be in leasehold)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(flat, is leasehold)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(flat, be in leasehold)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(flat, is leasehold)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(flat, be in leasehold)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flat, be in london leasehold)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(flat, be in leasehold)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(flat, have leases)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(flat, be in leasehold)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(flat, is leasehold)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(flat, be in leasehold)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(flat, have leases)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(flat, be in leasehold)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(flat, have leases)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(flat, be in leasehold)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(flat, have leases)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(flat, be in leasehold)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(flat, be in leasehold)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(flat, be in leasehold)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(flat, be in leasehold)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(flat, be in leasehold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(flat, be in leasehold)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(property, be in london leasehold)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(flat, be in leasehold)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(property, be in london leasehold)