flatware: be at fast-food restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at fast-food restaurant 1.00
be at restaurant 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(flatware, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(flatware, be at fast-food restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(flatware, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(flatware, be at restaurant)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(flatware, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(flatware, be at restaurant)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(flatware, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(flatware, be at restaurant)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(flatware, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(flatware, be at restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(flatware, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(flatware, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(flatware, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(flatware, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(flatware, be at fast-food restaurant)