flea: be with pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insect
Weight: 0.58
, parasite
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, cat
Weight: 0.52
Siblings gypsy moth
Weight: 0.33
, dog food
Weight: 0.32
, black cat
Weight: 0.32
, ladybug
Weight: 0.32
, honey bee
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with pets 1.00
affect pets 0.94
go on cats 0.87
be on dogs 0.87
be bad for cats 0.86
live on cats 0.86
get on dogs 0.86
live on dogs 0.85
help dogs 0.85
go on dogs 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(dog food, be bad for cats)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(dog food, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(dog food, be bad for cats)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(flea, be with pets)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(flea, go on cats)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(flea, live on cats)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(flea, go on cats)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(flea, go on cats)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(flea, live on cats)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(flea, live on cats)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(flea, live on dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(flea, get on dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(flea, go on dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(flea, live on cats)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(flea, live on dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(flea, go on cats)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(flea, go on dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(flea, be on dogs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(flea, go on dogs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(flea, get on dogs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(flea, be on dogs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(flea, live on dogs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(flea, be on dogs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(flea, get on dogs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(flea, go on dogs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(flea, be on dogs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(flea, live on dogs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(flea, get on dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(flea, be with pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(flea, be with pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(flea, be with pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(dog food, be bad for cats)