flea: benefit humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insect
Weight: 0.58
, parasite
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, cat
Weight: 0.52
Siblings gypsy moth
Weight: 0.33
, dog food
Weight: 0.32
, black cat
Weight: 0.32
, ladybug
Weight: 0.32
, honey bee
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
benefit humans 1.00
get on humans 0.85
live on humans 0.85
be bad for humans 0.84
jump on humans 0.78
bite humans 0.77
bite certain humans 0.77
attack humans 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dog food, be bad for humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(dog food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(dog food, be bad for humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(flea, benefit humans)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(flea, get on humans)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(flea, get on humans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(flea, live on humans)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(flea, get on humans)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(flea, be bad for humans)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(flea, bite humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(flea, attack humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(flea, be bad for humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(flea, live on humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(flea, get on humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(flea, live on humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(flea, jump on humans)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(flea, bite certain humans)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(flea, live on humans)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(flea, jump on humans)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(flea, bite humans)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(flea, attack humans)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(flea, bite certain humans)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(flea, bite humans)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(flea, attack humans)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(flea, jump on humans)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(flea, jump on humans)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(flea, bite humans)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(flea, bite certain humans)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(flea, attack humans)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(flea, be bad for humans)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(flea, bite certain humans)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(flea, be bad for humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(flea, benefit humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(flea, benefit humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(flea, benefit humans)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(dog food, be bad for humans)