flip flop: be considered bad for feet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crap
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.64
, item
Weight: 0.61
, shoe
Weight: 0.60
, circuit
Weight: 0.59
Siblings flop
Weight: 0.66
, hot day
Weight: 0.52
, big bang
Weight: 0.33
, light switch
Weight: 0.33
, hop
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered bad for feet 1.00
be considered bad 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(flip flop, be considered bad for feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(flop, be considered bad for feet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(flip flop, be considered bad for feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(flop, be considered bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(flip flop, be considered bad for feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(flop, be considered bad for feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(flop, be considered bad for feet)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(flip flop, be considered bad for feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(flop, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(flop, be considered bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(flip flop, be considered bad for feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(flip flop, be considered bad for feet)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(flip flop, be considered bad for feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(flip flop, be considered bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(flip flop, be considered bad for feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(flip flop, be considered bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(flip flop, be considered bad for feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(flip flop, be considered bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(flip flop, be considered bad for feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flip flop, be considered bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(flip flop, be considered bad for feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flip flop, be considered bad for feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(flip flop, be considered bad for feet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(flip flop, be considered bad for feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flip flop, be considered bad for feet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(flip flop, be considered bad for feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(flop, be considered bad for feet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(flip flop, be considered bad for feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(flop, be considered bad)