flirting: is else cheating

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sexual harassment
Weight: 0.54
, behavior
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, film
Weight: 0.44
, relationship
Weight: 0.37
Siblings talking
Weight: 0.32
, sexual assault
Weight: 0.32
, kissing
Weight: 0.32
, laughing
Weight: 0.31
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is else cheating 1.00
is cheating 0.94
is internet cheating 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(flirting, is else cheating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(kissing, is cheating)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(flirting, is else cheating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(kissing, is cheating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(kissing, is cheating)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(flirting, is else cheating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(flirting, is else cheating)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(flirting, is else cheating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(flirting, is cheating)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(flirting, is else cheating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(flirting, is internet cheating)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(flirting, is else cheating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(flirting, is cheating)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(flirting, is else cheating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(flirting, is cheating)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(flirting, is else cheating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(flirting, is internet cheating)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(flirting, is else cheating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(flirting, is internet cheating)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(flirting, is else cheating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(flirting, is internet cheating)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(flirting, is else cheating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(flirting, is cheating)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(flirting, is else cheating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(flirting, is else cheating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(flirting, is else cheating)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(flirting, is else cheating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(flirting, is else cheating)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(flirting, is else cheating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(kissing, is cheating)