float: was like butterfly sting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ice cream
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, part
Weight: 0.49
, element
Weight: 0.49
Siblings balloon
Weight: 0.31
, hop
Weight: 0.30
, mermaid
Weight: 0.30
, parade
Weight: 0.30
, sink
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
was like butterfly sting 1.00
was like butterfly sting like bee 0.96
was like butterfly sting like bee famous 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(float, was like butterfly sting)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(float, was like butterfly sting)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(float, was like butterfly sting)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(float, was like butterfly sting like bee)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(float, was like butterfly sting)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(float, was like butterfly sting like bee famous)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(float, was like butterfly sting)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(float, was like butterfly sting like bee)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(float, was like butterfly sting)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(float, was like butterfly sting like bee famous)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(float, was like butterfly sting)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(float, was like butterfly sting like bee)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(float, was like butterfly sting)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(float, was like butterfly sting like bee famous)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(float, was like butterfly sting)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(float, was like butterfly sting like bee)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(float, was like butterfly sting)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(float, was like butterfly sting like bee famous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(float, was like butterfly sting)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(float, was like butterfly sting)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(float, was like butterfly sting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(float, was like butterfly sting)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(float, was like butterfly sting)